"At the end of the day, boys, you don't tell me how rough the water is, you bring in the ship." – Steve Stone | |||
|
|||
![]()
• Wrigley Rooftop Directory
|
Runs in RetrospectMonday, July 26, 2004![]() It sure is nice to run up the white and blue 'W' flag. Tonight's game was on WCIU, and I was taking an exam and then working, so I haven't gotten to see any of the game or highlights. But, the Cubs won 3-1 over Milwaukee, finally getting Matt Clement enough run support to give him a victory. (Not that 3 runs, all of which came after Clement threw his last pitch... is all that much.) I did see that there was a Derrek Lee home run, and that Mark Grudzielanek went 3 for 4 with 2 RBI, but I want to watch the game later so I'm not digging in too deep to the boxscore. Tonight's post is one that has been in the works for a few days now. I wanted to look at the Cubs offensive output for signs of a trend, or consistency. What I came up with is not profound, or anything that a half way conscious Cubs fan couldn't tell you... the Cubs have been Wildly Inconsistent. First, the pictures. ![]() This is a graph of the Cubs average runs scored for the previous 10 games. (i.e. the average runs scored for games #5-15 are the data point for game #15.) ![]() This is a graph of the Cubs average runs allowed for the previous 10 games. (i.e. the average runs allowed for games #5-15 are the data point for game #15.) ![]() This graph lays the previous two graphs on top of each other for comparison. ![]() This final graph shows the Cubs predicted winning percentage, using the Pythagorean standings vs the Cubs' actual winning percentage. Now, The Numbers: as of July 26,2004 after the game.
Posted by Byron at July 26, 2004 11:27 PM
|
|
Subscribe to The Cubdom - get emails with the latest Cubs info and pictures | |
This post has been tagged: |
Leave a comment